Publications

Go back to Resources

Outcomes of Liver Transplant Recipients with Hepatitis C and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection

Jun-12

Journal Article

Authors:

Terrault, N.A.
Roland, M.E.
Schiano, T.
Dove, L.
Wong, M.
Poordad, F.
Ragni, M.V.
Barin, B.
Simon, D.
Olthoff, K.M.
Johnson, L.
Stosor, V.
Jayaweera, D.
Fung, J.
Sherman, K.E.
Subramanian, A.
Millis, J.
Slakey, D.
Berg, C.
Carlson, L.
Ferrell, L.
Stablein, D.

Secondary:
Liver Transpl

Volume:
18

Pagination:
716-726

URL:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22328294

Keywords:
Graft Survival; HCV; HCV/HIV; HIV; kidney-liver transplantation; liver transplantation; Multi-center study

Abstract:
<p>{Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a controversial indication for liver transplantation (LT) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients because of reportedly poor outcomes. This prospective, multicenter US cohort study compared patient and graft survival for 89 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients and 2 control groups: 235 HCV-monoinfected LT controls and all US transplant recipients who were 65 years old or older. The 3-year patient and graft survival rates were 60% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 47%-71%] and 53% (95% CI = 40%-64%) for the HCV/HIV patients and 79% (95% CI = 72%-84%) and 74% (95% CI = 66%-79%) for the HCV-infected recipients (P &lt; 0.001 for both), and HIV infection was the only factor significantly associated with reduced patient and graft survival. Among the HCV/HIV patients, older donor age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3 per decade], combined kidney-liver transplantation (HR = 3.8), an anti-HCV-positive donor (HR = 2.5), and a body mass index &lt; 21 kg/m(2) (HR = 3.2) were independent predictors of graft loss. For the patients without the last 3 factors, the patient and graft survival rates were similar to those for US LT recipients. The 3-year incidence of treated acute rejection was 1.6-fold higher for the HCV/HIV patients versus the HCV patients (39% versus 24%, log rank P = 0.02), but the cumulative rates of severe HCV disease at 3 years were not significantly different (29% versus 23%</p>

Go back to Resources