Publications

Go back to Resources

A multicenter comparison study between the Endosafe PTS rapid-release testing system and traditional methods for detecting endotoxin in cell-therapy products.

2008

Journal Article

Authors:
Gee, A.P.; Sumstad, D.; Stanson, J.; Watson, P.; Proctor, J.; Kadidlo, D.; Koch, E.; Sprague, J.; Wood, D.; Styers, D.; McKenna, D.; Gallelli, J.; Griffin, D.; Read, E.J.; Parish, B.; Lindblad, R.

Secondary:
Cytotherapy

Volume:
10

Pagination:
427-35

Issue:
4

PMID:
18574775

DOI:
10.1080/14653240802075476

Keywords:
Animals; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Drug Contamination; Endotoxins; Humans; Limulus Test; Reference Standards; Reproducibility of Results; Time Factors

Abstract:
<p>BACKGROUND: Rapid-release testing reduces the waiting period for administration of time-sensitive cell-therapy products. Current assay systems are labor intensive and time consuming. The Endosafe portable test system (PTS) is a chromogenic Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) portable endotoxin detection system that provides quantitative results in approximately 15 min. To evaluate Endosafe performance with cell-therapy products, side-by-side testing of traditional LAL systems and the Endosafe system was conducted at the Production Assistance for Cellular Therapies (PACT) facilities and the National Institutes of Health&#039;s Department of Transfusion Medicine, USA.METHODS: Charles River Laboratories provided each center with a PTS reader and two commercially prepared lyophilized reference standard endotoxin (RSE) vials. All samples tested with the Endosafe system used 0.05-5.0 endotoxin unit/mL (EU/mL) sensitivity cartridges provided by Charles River. Each vial was reconstituted with LAL water and tested in triplicate using the Endosafe and in-house LAL methods. Subsequently, each center tested the endotoxin content of standard dilutions of cell-therapy products, thus creating paired test results for each sample. Additionally, fabricated endotoxin-positive samples containing varying concentrations of endotoxin were prepared and shipped to all centers to perform blinded testing.RESULTS: Valid paired results, based on each center&#039;s LAL method and the Endosafe system criteria, were analyzed. Endotoxin detection between paired results was equivalent in most cases.DISCUSSION: The Endosafe system provided reliable results with products typically produced in cell-therapy manufacturing facilities, and would be an appropriate test on which to base the release of time-sensitive cell-therapy products.</p>

Go back to Resources